<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Circuits by Analogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/circuits-by-analogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/circuits-by-analogy/</link>
	<description>The collected ramblings of six physics grad students and postdocs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/circuits-by-analogy/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-441</guid>
		<description>I tend to prefer a mass attached to a spring slidiing a frictionless surface for the RC circuit analogy.  Somehow the inductance/mass and capacitance/spring constant analogies seem more intuitive to me than inductance/length of string and capacitance/g.  I suppose it makes adding a resistor a bit harder, since the idea of a velocity dependent frictional force is likely to be pretty foreign to them, but nicer for the basic one in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to prefer a mass attached to a spring slidiing a frictionless surface for the RC circuit analogy.  Somehow the inductance/mass and capacitance/spring constant analogies seem more intuitive to me than inductance/length of string and capacitance/g.  I suppose it makes adding a resistor a bit harder, since the idea of a velocity dependent frictional force is likely to be pretty foreign to them, but nicer for the basic one in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/circuits-by-analogy/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-440</guid>
		<description>So what&#039;s the analogy for a circuit with an inductor, capacitor, and memristor? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the analogy for a circuit with an inductor, capacitor, and memristor? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traums</title>
		<link>http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/circuits-by-analogy/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Traums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imaginarypotential.wordpress.com/?p=181#comment-439</guid>
		<description>A circuit with an inductor, capacitor, resistor, AC power source and a noise generator is bad for your grades ^_,^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A circuit with an inductor, capacitor, resistor, AC power source and a noise generator is bad for your grades ^_,^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
